What does a typical engagement produce?
A control-to-automation map, security policy stored as code in your repositories, pull-request security checks, and an evidence index with export jobs an independent assessor can examine.
Yellow Theme Method
The yellow team builds security in. We install enforceable checks and an evidence trail in the repositories and CI you already run — with Plan, Access, Evidence, and pack acceptance in the client portal after deposit.
The SOW lists the artifacts you will receive—such as a control matrix, pipeline checks, and an evidence index—and locks the budget before kickoff. You are paying for agreed outcomes, not a stack of billable hours.
Calls and the optional weekly sync stay inside 7:00–10:30 a.m. Central Time. Written replies arrive within 24 business hours and can land outside that call window. The engagement includes at most one 30-minute sync each week and does not include 24/7 on-call coverage or a full-time Slack presence.
Policies live in the repository. Security checks run in continuous integration. Policy checks using Open Policy Agent (OPA) or Conftest, pipeline gates, and an evidence index link each control to the relevant file, pipeline run, log, or ticket, so the assessor can follow the trail without hunting through screenshots.
Yellow Theme adds focused engineering capacity; it does not become a permanent member of your team. Your engineering lead reviews the pull requests and owns the guardrails after handoff.
Yellow Theme retains no client data on its own systems unless the agreement says otherwise. Client code and credentials are not used to train AI models.
Public pieces of the yellow theme method. Each link is live today.
Open the notes — practical write-ups from building secure delivery systems. Examples use stand-in values; no client names.
Open the labs — guided shells that reproduce a failure, then prove the fix. Simulated environment only.
Synthetic reference repositories you can inspect:
Run the readiness check — free, about three minutes, direction not a score.
Create a brief — written fit note and fixed-fee SOW before any deposit.
Zero client-data retention on our side — enforced · Calls 7:00–10:30 a.m. Central Time · written replies within 24 business hours
One pattern we implement across SOC 2 and infrastructure as code (IaC) engagements. Continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) runs build, test, static application security testing (SAST), vulnerability scan, and secret scan before deploy.
App repos │ ▼ CI/CD (build · test · SAST · vuln scan · secret scan) │ ├──► Staging deploy gate │ ▼ IaC (tagged · encrypted · drift-checked) │ ▼ Logging & monitoring (retention · alerts) │ ▼ Evidence export → assessor index
See synthetic samples in the deliverables gallery. Inspect the CI workflow and the storage policy.
A control-to-automation map, security policy stored as code in your repositories, pull-request security checks, and an evidence index with export jobs an independent assessor can examine.
No. We wire engineering controls and evidence into tools you already use — or into git directly — so GRC dashboards reflect reality.
Scoped repo, CI, and cloud access for environments in scope. Least-privilege roles and async PR reviews — not shared admin consoles.
Fixed-fee SOW with named deliverables. We win when your audit passes on time — not when the engagement runs long.
Guardrails outcomes, a free readiness check, the sample pack — or the three-minute project brief.